← Search

Jennifer Oliveira

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Miami, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 84W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history148 matches
W
2026-10-26 · Red Hot Chili Peppers at Coral Pine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angelica Gallagher
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-21 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Thompson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-19 · Red Hot Chili Peppers at Coral Pine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Magdalena Suarez
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-30 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eunice McCann
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-30 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Thompson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-28 · Red Hot Chili Peppers at Coral Pine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Roque
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-09-25 · Red Hot Chili Peppers at Coral Pine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Roque
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-14 · Red Hot Chili Peppers at Coral Pine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Roque
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-10 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosy Bild
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Feldman
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
Garbine Guerrero / Dasha Moser
2026-04-02 · Royal Palm (Slaman) · #1 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Coles
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-0
L
2026-03-09 · Red Hot Chili Peppers at Coral Pine Park · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisette Trimble
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 59.2% of games
3.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 58.9% of games
3.5
50%
44W–44L · 48.8% of games
4.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 61.1% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#2 Singles
12%
18 matches
#1 Singles
10%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
13 matches
#4 Female Doubles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal