← Search

Elaine Pizzarelli

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Darien, CT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 14W–13L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history27 matches
L
2026-10-28 · KH:King's Highway Aces:Pizzarelli · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hedi OConnor
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-18 · KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Foresta
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-09 · KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Koons
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-08 · KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Danchak
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-13 · KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Danchak
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-02-26 · KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shari Matusow
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-11-20 · KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annemarie Rothe
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-10-24 · KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Selina Huber
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-04 · CP:Chelsea Tsunami:Raman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darren Senzon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2022-09-30 · SOL:Smashers:O'Connor/Pizzarelli · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalia Anderson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-02-25 · SOL:Smashers:O'Connor/Pizzarelli · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Galvin
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-02-11 · SOL:Smashers:O'Connor/Pizzarelli · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Delice Bolotin
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.6% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 39.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe