← Search

Martha van Cleve

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pasadena, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 33W–34L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history67 matches
L
2026-10-03 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Whitall championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-02 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Whitall championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Dare Doubles · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Lewnes
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-12 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Legal
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-2
L
2026-06-03 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Rase
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-29 · Dare Doubles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Lewnes
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-06 · Dare Doubles · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrea Perotti
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-01 · Dare Doubles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Mehl
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-20 · Dare Doubles 1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Legal
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-06-16 · Dare Doubles 2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Rase
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-05 · Dare Doubles 2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Whitall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-27 · Dare Doubles 2 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maria Birnkammer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 55.7% of games
6.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 66.4% of games
7.0
45.5%
15W–18L · 52.7% of games
8.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 28.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal