← Search

Peter Wessel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Houston, TX
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
12 matches · 5W–7L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history12 matches
L
2026-03-28 · The Met - Magic · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ana Wessel mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · The Met - Magic · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Magdalena Pyrkosz mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · The Met - Magic · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ana Wessel mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2020-02-23 · Met-Magic · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julia Busby mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2020-01-26 · Met-Magic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Beddow mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2019-11-03 · Met-Magic · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ana Wessel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2019-10-13 · Met-Magic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Beddow mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2019-04-07 · Met-Magic · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ana Wessel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2019-03-24 · Met-Magic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ana Wessel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2019-02-17 · Met-Magic · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ana Wessel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2019-01-27 · Met-Magic · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ana Wessel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
W
2018-12-09 · Met-Magic · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ana Wessel mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
25%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova