← Search

Craig Cacheris

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Phoenix, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 16W–13L · seasons 2022–2025
Match history29 matches
W
2025-08-19 · 7.5 PHO Butruff/Mason Tues · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Butruff
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-07-22 · 7.5 PHO Butruff/Mason Tues · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Butruff
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-02-03 · 4.5 SCR Springs M18S · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Noah Schott
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-12-16 · 8.0 CBV Butruff Timm X18F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Irina McMahon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-11-25 · 4.5 SCR Springs M18F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Delp
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-04-04 · 9.0 PTC Everyone's a Loser X18S · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Beth Kaper mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-03-28 · 9.0 PTC Everyone's a Loser X18S · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with MacKinzie McKeown mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-02-22 · 9.0 PTC Everyone's a Loser X18S · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with MacKinzie McKeown mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
L
2024-01-25 · 9.0 PTC Everyone's a Loser X18S · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Amy Rhoden mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2024-01-19 · 8.0 CBV Curtis X18S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susie Timm mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-01-12 · 8.0 CBV Curtis X18S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Ashman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-12-13 · 9.0 PTC Everyone's a Loser X18F · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with MacKinzie McKeown mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 55.5% of games
9.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 37.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
45%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer