← Search

Charlene Keller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 96W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history166 matches
L
2026-10-24 · Indy A40 3.5W CRC Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Filler championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-23 · Indy A40 3.5W CRC Williams · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Filler championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · Mid Tri W CRC Lynch · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carrie Frizzell
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · Indy A40 3.5W CRC Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Pychinka championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-21 · Indy A40 3.5W CRC Williams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Filler championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-16 · Mid Tri W CRC Lynch · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelley Williams
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-02 · Indy A40 3.5W CRC Williams · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Filler championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Strobel · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Filler
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-13 · Indy A40 3.5W CRC Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mandy Prenger
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Strobel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Filler
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
Default
2026-06-18 · Indy A40 4.0W IRCD Strobel · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Workman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · Indy A40 3.5W CRC Williams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Medler
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 65.7% of games
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 62.1% of games
3.5
70%
28W–12L · 60.9% of games
4.0
30.6%
11W–25L · 43.4% of games
6.5
50%
10W–10L · 55.4% of games
7.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 60.2% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
30 matches
#1 Singles
15%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert