← Search

Benjamin Siegel

— year-end
19 matches · 10W–9L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Benjamin Siegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
W
2022-05-31 · Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Archie Alvarez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2022-05-22 · Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Archie Alvarez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2022-05-15 · Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Laderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2021-06-18 · Bhagwagar/Lee · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2021-06-07 · Bhagwagar/Lee · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2021-05-23 · Bhagwagar/Lee · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nishad Deshpande
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2021-05-13 · Bhagwagar/Lee · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vineet Ahuja
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2020-01-07 · Melnik · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Mink mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2019-12-16 · Melnik · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Mink mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-3
L
2019-11-11 · Melnik · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hayley Mink mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
W
2019-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Copenhaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Atiba Rodriguez
2019-05-12 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams3 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
11 matches
#1 Singles
16%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal