Gilda Tebeaux
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Worth, TX
464 matches · 304W–160L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history464 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams106 teams · 2019–2027
RTC ALBUS
TCU YEAGER
Team 1 Kiest/Campbell W4.5S
Team 2 Oak Creek/Schonwald-Newberg W4.0S
Albus/Tebeaux
Albus/Tebeaux
Albus/Tebeaux
Albus/Tebeaux
CCC YEAGER
CCC YEAGER
Greenhill/Schonwald-Newberg W4.0s
Kiest/Albus W4.0F
Kiest/Albus W4.0T
Kiest/Campbell W4.5S
Kiest/Campbell-Clayton W4.5S
Kiest/Campbell-Clayton W4.5S
RTC ALBUS
RTC ALBUS
RTC ALBUS
RTC REILLY
Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0F
Samuell Grand/Thornton-Musick W4.0S
Team 8 Gilda Tebeaux/Teresa Albus 8.5W
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 69.1% of games
3.0
80%
56W–14L · 60.9% of games
3.5
72.9%
62W–23L · 58.9% of games
4.0
51.5%
68W–64L · 52.7% of games
4.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.1% of games
6.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.7% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 53.3% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 59.3% of games
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 51.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Singles, 29% of the time
#1 Singles
29%
136 matches
Singles
24%
113 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
50 matches
#2 Singles
7%
30 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.