← Search

Mark Gabriel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Atlanta, GA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 13W–9L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history22 matches
L
2026-10-16 · USTA Atlanta/Rodney Nilson · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Enoch Leung championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · USTA Atlanta/Rodney Nilson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Cizek championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-25 · USTA Atlanta/Rodney Nilson · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Cizek championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-24 · USTA Atlanta/Rodney Nilson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Cizek championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · Kings Farm (Rodney Nilson) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Valastro
loading the estimate
4-4
W
2026-03-01 · USTA Atlanta/Rodney Nilson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Cizek
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-02-28 · Kings Farm (Rodney Nilson) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Valastro
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 6-2
W
2026-02-25 · USTA Atlanta/Rodney Nilson · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marc van Eekeren
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-04-12 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steve Brandt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-06 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Justin Gannon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-2
L
Eric Rabenold / Steve Santandera
2025-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Valastro
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-2, 4-6
L
2024-03-17 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lindy Blount
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
60%
9W–6L · 60.7% of games
9.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
27%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams