← Search

Melissa Richardson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greenville, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 92W–128L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history220 matches
W
2026-10-14 · UPTA54FF/Hughes/GCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Davis
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-2
L
2026-10-07 · UPTA54FF/White/acac · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Belva White
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-23 · UPTA55C/White/acac · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Belva White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-18 · #3 Doubles · with Jeanne Robinson
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-18 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Infinger
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-09 · UPTA55C/White/acac · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Belva White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-09-01 · FTA55C/acac/White · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracie Segura
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-30 · Not Going (Gitlitz) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-22 · Not Going (Gitlitz) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachael Shepherd
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · UPTA55C/White/acac · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Belva White
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · FTA55C/acac/White · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracie Segura
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-09 · Not Going (Gitlitz) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracie Segura
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams74 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
48.8%
63W–66L · 48.8% of games
3.5
28.6%
14W–35L · 41% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 46.6% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
57 matches
#2 Singles
7%
16 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal