← Search

Halley Badger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
North Augusta, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 111W–111L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history222 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Riverview/Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Praveena Venugopalan
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-21 · ACC/Thomas-Blanchard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Yort
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-10-21 · Riverview/Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Pracht
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-10-19 · ACC/Thomas-Blanchard · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Johnson
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-17 · NTC/Sprague · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Homan
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-03 · NTC/Sprague · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Senn
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-09-16 · ACC/Thomas-Blanchard · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Yort
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-16 · Riverview/Smith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jan Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · ACC/Thomas-Blanchard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Yort
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · Riverview/Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lun Cai
loading the estimate
1-6
L
2026-08-29 · NTC/Sprague · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Rogerson
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-26 · ACC/Thomas-Blanchard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Ashmore
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.4% of games
3.0
53.2%
33W–29L · 49.8% of games
3.5
50.5%
49W–48L · 47.1% of games
4.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 41.6% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
12W–4L · 59% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 53.1% of games
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.2% of games
6.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 70.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#1 Singles
23%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe