← Search

Debra Stepan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lake Bluff, IL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 12W–5L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history17 matches
W
2024-02-29 · Royal Poinciana - Simmons · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Moschner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-02-08 · Royal Poinciana - Simmons · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Moschner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-01-18 · Royal Poinciana - Simmons · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Moschner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2023-02-09 · Royal Poinciana - · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Moschner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-02-02 · Royal Poinciana - · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Moschner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2022-02-24 · Royal Poinciana - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Moschner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-17 · Royal Poinciana - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Robertson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 0-3
L
2022-02-10 · Royal Poinciana - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Moschner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2022-01-30 · Royal Poinciana - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Rogers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-01-13 · Royal Poinciana - Rogers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Moschner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2020-02-27 · RP Pearls -Royal Poinciana - C. Rogers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Ann Moschner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2020-02-13 · RP Pearls -Royal Poinciana - C. Rogers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Kelly
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams