← Search

Joan Hazen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sarasota, FL
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
43 matches · 19W–24L · seasons 2019–2022
Match history43 matches
W
2022-03-30 · Payne Park Callaghan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara Ruffner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
L
2022-03-23 · Payne Park Callaghan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Komarin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-02-23 · Payne Park Callaghan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Hynes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-02-07 · Payne Park Williamson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mari Koerner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-01-19 · Payne Park Callaghan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Watkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-01-17 · Payne Park Williamson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Watkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
L
2021-12-06 · Payne Park Williamson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara Ruffner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2021-11-22 · Payne Park Williamson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara Ruffner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2021-11-09 · Payne Park Barcley · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joanne Watkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-11-08 · Payne Park Williamson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanne Watkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2021-11-02 · Payne Park Williamson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Dannemann
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-6
L
2021-10-26 · Payne Park Barcley · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kara Ruffner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 45.2% of games
6.5
50%
8W–8L · 46.8% of games
7.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 77% of the time
#3 Doubles
77%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe