← Search

Irene Quilez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 73W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history142 matches
L
2026-09-11 · ACAC Quilez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Toft
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-09 · ACAC Callaghan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Rosenthal
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-25 · ACAC Quilez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Guerette
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-21 · ACAC Quilez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Toft
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · ACAC Callaghan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bhel Bueta
loading the estimate
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · ACAC Callaghan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Martin
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · ACAC Callaghan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bufford
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · ACAC The Slice Girls Lutterbie/King · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Kelsey
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · 2 ACAC Hoefer/Camden · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Landrum
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-4
L
2026-06-20 · ACAC The Slice Girls Lutterbie/King · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Lewis
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · ACAC The Slice Girls Lutterbie/King · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Pfeiffer
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · 2 ACAC Hoefer/Camden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Pfeiffer
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 55.9% of games
3.0
61%
25W–16L · 56.1% of games
3.5
35%
21W–39L · 44.1% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 54.7% of games
6.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 57% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 49.6% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
29 matches
#2 Singles
9%
13 matches
#1 Singles
8%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer