← Search

Brandon Thio

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 24W–51L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brandon Thio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
L
2026-09-08 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nick Gartner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-25 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alec Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-07-28 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · JMorse/JClayton (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Kuykendal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · IPetkov/CErtman (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · IPetkov/CErtman (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Graham mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-06 · BShamanis (Queens) · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · JMorse/JClayton (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-30 · IPetkov/CErtman (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · JMorse/JClayton (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Myles Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-17 · JMorse/JClayton (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zain Haider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
33.3%
14W–28L · 42.6% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.6% of games
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.2% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.9% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
12 matches
#2 Singles
11%
8 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert