← Search

Emma M Cestero

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Juan, PR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 120W–139L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history259 matches
W
2026-11-01 · San Francisco - Racket Scientists · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hector Pizarro Flores mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-10-25 · San Francisco - Racket Scientists · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hector Pizarro Flores mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-10-24 · San Francisco - Silent Smashers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with JOSE Calderon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-18 · San Francisco - Racket Scientists · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hector Pizarro Flores mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-10-16 · San Francisco - Silent Smashers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carlos Corrada Bravo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-09 · San Francisco - Silent Smashers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jose Escribano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · San Francisco - Silent Smashers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jose Escribano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-24 · Club San Francisco - Duos Dinamicos · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eduardo Sanvido mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-15 · Club San Francisco - Duos Dinamicos · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Alfredo Lugo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-09-13 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hector Rivera Martinez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-12 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nelson Viera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-04 · Game, Set y Cerveza! · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Pagan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
3.0
56.5%
48W–37L · 51.6% of games
6.0
52.4%
22W–20L · 51.4% of games
7.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 47.6% of games
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 56.1% of games
6.0mixed
35.8%
24W–43L · 45.1% of games
7.0mixed
34.4%
11W–21L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
67 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
21 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams