← Search

Malcolm Jones

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Jacksonville, FL
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
77 matches · 36W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history77 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Epping - Scherr · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Wood
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-18 · Epping Forest - Scherr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tyler Scherr
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-21 · Epping Forest - Scherr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Lohman
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-13 · Epping Forest Berger · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tyler Scherr
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-16 · Epping Forest Berger · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Greene
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-09 · Epping Forest Berger · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Wood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-19 · Epping Forest Berger · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Wood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 0-6
L
2024-04-20 · San Jose - Cumbow · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-24 · San Jose - Cumbow · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Scott
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-01-27 · San Jose - Cumbow · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-20 · San Jose - Cumbow · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-08-26 · San Jose - Cumbow · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abe Dopazo
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
65%
13W–7L · 52.7% of games
3.5
37.8%
14W–23L · 47.6% of games
6.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.6% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 25% of the time
#2 Doubles
25%
19 matches
#1 Singles
20%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#2 Singles
10%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert