← Search

Claudia Paz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
FRANKLIN, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 89W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024 and 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history165 matches
W
2026-10-31 · Kumar/Nashville · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-28 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Blocher
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-14 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Villarreal
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-07 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Cox
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-30 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Cox
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-09-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessie Seaman championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McDugald championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Davis championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-08-26 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Blocher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-25 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-19 · Kumar/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynn Blocher
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-03 · Monte/Spittle/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Claire Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 48.9% of games
3.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 55.1% of games
3.5
47.6%
30W–33L · 48% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 40.9% of games
5.5
69.2%
18W–8L · 61.7% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 48.6% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.4% of games
3.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 26.2% of games
6.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
26 matches
#2 Singles
9%
15 matches
#1 Singles
9%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova