← Search

Gretchen Platt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
READING, PA
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 1W–11L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history12 matches
L
2024-05-17 · GPTL Smash · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Mattiola
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2024-04-19 · GPTL Smash · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Summers
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2023-05-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sue Summers
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-06-03 · Pottstown Smash · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Flowers
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2022-05-20 · Pottstown Smash · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Summers
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-05-13 · Pottstown Smash · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Blume
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2022-04-22 · Pottstown Smash · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Flowers
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2020-01-12 · Lau · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vinay Sood mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2019-12-22 · Lau · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Lau mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2019-11-24 · Lau · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeong Hwang mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
L
2019-11-03 · Lau · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vinay Sood mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2019-10-20 · Lau · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeong Hwang mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 36% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams