← Search

Scott Jordan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sandwich, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 30W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history63 matches
W
2026-10-31 · MCAC:Veninger · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hamilton
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · MCAC:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Stetkis Sperco championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-09-18 · MCAC:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Mckenna championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-28 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hagenstein
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-21 · MCAC:Veninger · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hagenstein
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Bates
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-21 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Abdel Elmemeh
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-31 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Bates
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-17 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Abdel Elmemeh
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-15 · MCAC:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Mckenna
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-11-08 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Mckenna
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-10-25 · MCAC:Veninger · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Mckenna
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.4% of games
8.0
48.1%
26W–28L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King