Chris Hill
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hattiesburg, MS
90 matches · 49W–41L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history90 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-2
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 59.8% of games
3.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 53.5% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 41.9% of games
6.5
0%
0W–7L · 31.1% of games
2.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.5% of games
3.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.5% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 54.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Pressure is a privilege.