← Search

Mollie Williams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Durham, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 195W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history258 matches
W
2026-10-06 · VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Lacoff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-09-21 · TOC.Morgan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacey Burkert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Virginia Dirschl championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-26 · VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Abigail Presson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-24 · TOC.Morgan · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Johnson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-17 · TOC.Morgan · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stacey Burkert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Lacoff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · TOC.Morgan · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathy Endres
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-02 · LBible-UNC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Virginia Dirschl
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke DeMarco championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke DeMarco championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Boesch championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 64.9% of games
3.5
75%
18W–6L · 67.6% of games
4.0
89.7%
35W–4L · 69.3% of games
4.5
61.5%
48W–30L · 54.2% of games
7.5
94.9%
37W–2L · 70.2% of games
8.5
75%
36W–12L · 58.5% of games
4.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.8% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
31 matches
#1 Singles
9%
24 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert