← Search

Gipson Erwin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lafayette, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 111W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history144 matches
L
2026-07-23 · Disotell/40/Div II W/Tri/BVR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christin Barrios
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · Roth/40/4.0/MX/BEVR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lance Broussard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-09 · Roth/18/4.0/MX/YSC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Louis Roth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Roth/18/4.0/MX/YSC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ben Pok mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-02 · Roth/40/4.0/MX/BEVR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryant Angelle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-05-26 · Roth/40/4.0/MX/BEVR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bryant Angelle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-18 · Dugas/18/4.5/WN/CCRR · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Bergeron
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-03-12 · Dugas/18/4.5/WN/CCRR · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Bergeron
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-09 · Robicheaux/18/4.0/WN/CCRR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Malespin
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-20 · Taylor/40/4.0/WD/BEVR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vallery Albritton
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · Dugas/18/4.5/WN/CCRR · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Holly Hagle
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-16 · Robicheaux/18/4.0/WN/CCRR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Malespin
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 70.8% of games
3.0
73.3%
22W–8L · 56.5% of games
3.5
87%
20W–3L · 66.1% of games
4.0
50%
8W–8L · 52.9% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 70.2% of games
6.5
94.4%
17W–1L · 73.3% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.3% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 58.8% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
34 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert