← Search

Peilan Yao

Weston, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 131W–78L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Peilan Yao to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
L
2026-08-30 · Veltri/Wank · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alicia Dominguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-27 · MissionBay/Goetz · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gina Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-20 · MissionBay/Goetz · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karen Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · Woodmont/Morato · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Karen Williams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Jennifer Spann / Angie Shoemaker
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Raiza Matheus championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Raiza Matheus championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · MissionBay/Goetz · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karen Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · Veltri/Wank · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maria Monserratte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-16 · MissionBay/Goetz · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karen Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Woodmont/Morato · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · MissionBay/Goetz · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karen Lu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
94.1%
16W–1L · 64.6% of games
4.0
72.8%
67W–25L · 57% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 50.4% of games
8.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 44.6% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
38.5%
15W–24L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
52 matches
#1 Singles
8%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova