← Search

Ani Gonzales

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Perrysburg, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
269 matches · 177W–92L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history269 matches
W
2026-09-13 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W DAY Bloomquist-AW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yijung Her championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Dorner/Farrar-PTC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Gauthier
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-10 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Dorner/Farrar-PTC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Engel
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W DAY Bloomquist-AW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marayart Li
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Keating/Zinz-AW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kurstyn Loeffler
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-23 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W DAY Bloomquist-AW · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Yijung Her
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Zinz/Feltner-AW · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelly Gottschalk
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-4
L
2026-07-20 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Dorner/Farrar-PTC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Engel
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Zinz/Feltner-AW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Jo French
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-02 · NWO 18&Over 4.0W Keating/Zinz-AW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Hartzell
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-23 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Zinz/Feltner-AW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shelly Gottschalk
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · NWO 55&Over 8.0W Dorner/Farrar-PTC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Gauthier
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 73.9% of games
3.0
83.3%
25W–5L · 73.6% of games
3.5
90.3%
56W–6L · 67.4% of games
4.0
44.8%
13W–16L · 50.5% of games
5.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 66.3% of games
6.5
80%
24W–6L · 60.8% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 51.6% of games
7.5
30%
3W–7L · 48.1% of games
8.0
50%
6W–6L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.1% of games
7.0mixed
43.9%
18W–23L · 45.4% of games
8.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
98 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
68 matches
#1 Singles
4%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe