← Search

Daniel Romeyn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Britain, CT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 16W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history35 matches
W
2026-09-26 · (A) RFL:Tigers:Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Arciero
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-14 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trevor Glasgow
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-12-13 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trevor Glasgow
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-11-08 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Boyle
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-10-15 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Bowers
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-04-12 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Arciero
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-04-06 · EHTC:Nutmeg Legends:Kalisher/ · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Raymond
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 2-6
L
2025-03-22 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Werner
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-5
L
2025-02-15 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Kapiloff
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-02-08 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trevor Glasgow
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2024-11-24 · FV:Tri Breakers:Na/Trett · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ethan Na
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-11-16 · RFL:Burda/Sucoll · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trevor Glasgow
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
55.6%
15W–12L · 54.8% of games
5.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe