← Search

Sarah Rider

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 90W–16L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history106 matches
W
2026-10-09 · Lanc CC - Betteridge / Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-09-25 · Lanc CC - Betteridge / Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · Lanc CC - Betteridge · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
Elizabeth Kim / Rebecca Perkins
2026-01-24 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikaela Leaman championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-23 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikaela Leaman championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-10 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikaela Leaman championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-11-21 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-11-02 · Lanc CC - Betteridge · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-31 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-10-17 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 70.4% of games
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 69.8% of games
4.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 60.9% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
6W–0L · 77.4% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 67.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
16 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe