← Search

Janine Turley

Portland, OR
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
9 matches · 4W–5L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janine Turley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history9 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Serves You Right · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Vanessa Gebbie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-8
L
2026-07-28 · Serves You Right · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Paige Beardsley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-8
L
2026-03-07 · LOTC-Gebbie/Clarke · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joyce Delacruz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-30 · LOTC-Gebbie/Clarke · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sidney Clarke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-25 · LOTC-Gebbie/Clarke · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kitty Yan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2019-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyle McAvoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2019-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Naun Yvonne Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2019-05-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carrie Norris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2019-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 44.7% of games
0.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
22%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova