← Search

Michael Cellucci

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chadds Ford, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 50W–48L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history98 matches
L
2026-10-09 · Watermen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Hines championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-22 · Watermen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Leida championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-21 · Watermen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Hines championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · Watermen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Leida championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · Watermen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Hines
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Watermen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neil McNair Jr
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-03-27 · Game Point Commanders · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Cellucci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-08 · Penn Oaks 7.0 Mixed · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Fritsch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-22 · Penn Oaks 7.0 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joanna Wong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · Game Point Commanders · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Cellucci mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-18 · Penn Oaks 7.0 Mixed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lois Kester mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-16 · Game Point Commanders · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joana Gaizelyte-Lacy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
44.9%
22W–27L · 51.1% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 60.7% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer