← Search

Emily Jowers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pooler, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 152W–66L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history218 matches
L
2026-10-24 · DP - Tippins/Burks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Campbell
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-10-21 · BP - Hollis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Helmly
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-20 · BP - Hollis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shayn Bausch
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-03 · DP - Tippins/Burks · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Burks
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · BP - Hollis · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Monahan
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-29 · BP - Hollis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christie Risch
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-25 · DP - Staudt · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christie Risch
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Butch Durrence mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Stewart mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Butch Durrence mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Butch Durrence mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-30 · DP-Helmly/Staudt · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Copenhaver
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
84%
21W–4L · 65.7% of games
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 77.8% of games
3.5
78.4%
76W–21L · 62.6% of games
4.0
47.5%
28W–31L · 48.4% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 63.4% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.2% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
50 matches
#1 Singles
5%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova