← Search

MIchael Repinski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Palo Alto, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 74W–106L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history180 matches
L
2026-09-04 · SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rodrigo Mansilla
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 55MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Martinez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-25 · SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sailaja Brahmandam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-19 · SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paule Kodjou mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-19 · SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paule Kodjou mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-14 · SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Veronica Sanchez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AM3.5A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Leong
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · BUCHSER MS 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shang Liu
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-06 · BUCHSER MS 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shang Liu
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AM3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bo Dong
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-02 · BUCHSER MS 18AM4.0A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Duong
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · SANTA CLARA TC/SANTA CLARA TENNIS C 18AM3.5A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Leong
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 63.9% of games
3.5
22.6%
14W–48L · 39.6% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 32.9% of games
6.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.1% of games
7.0
0%
0W–7L · 42.9% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.4%
26W–15L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
23.8%
5W–16L · 40.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
48 matches
#1 Singles
7%
13 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams