← Search

Kim Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lubbock, TX
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 14W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history102 matches
L
2026-04-17 · Robbins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelly Welch
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-08 · Boggs/Zaragoza · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Pennie McWhorter
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
Emily Mayne / Jill Simpson
2025-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Debbie Hill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
Jill Simpson / Emily Mayne
2025-08-20 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Molly Lasater
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-08-13 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Molly Lasater
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-22 · Robbins · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Popp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-21 · Robbins · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Teresa Popp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-20 · Boggs · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Courtney Gage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-24 · Boggs · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Courtney Gage mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-07 · Davis · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with BRENDA HOWARD
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-16 · Davis · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with BRENDA HOWARD
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-15 · Davis · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Hill
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 31.9% of games
3.0
0%
0W–31L · 16.1% of games
5.5
30.4%
7W–16L · 38.7% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
14.3%
3W–18L · 31.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
13 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe