← Search

Alexandra Moody

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Swannanoa, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
262 matches · 163W–99L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history262 matches
W
2026-10-14 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kari Hubbard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-10-11 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim McKibbin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-07 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Celeste Sandridge
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-16 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Ager
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-06 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alexandra Murray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alexis Rosenfelt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-30 · WNCA Murray (Brevard) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Spradlin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-04 · WNCT Reeks (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hunter Carson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-01 · WNCT Reeks (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hunter Carson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Cook
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-4
W
2026-07-19 · WNCS Saidi (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Topmiller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · WNCA Moody (Aston Park) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lee Carson
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
100%
9W–0L · 71.4% of games
3.0
66.7%
20W–10L · 57.5% of games
3.5
72%
36W–14L · 56.8% of games
4.0
48.8%
21W–22L · 47.7% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 28.9% of games
5.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.7% of games
5.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.2% of games
6.5
85%
17W–3L · 63.1% of games
7.5
66.7%
20W–10L · 55.5% of games
8.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.3% of games
3.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.6% of games
4.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
100 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
69 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer