← Search

Samie Falvey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 86W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2019. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-10-31 · Vamos/Johnson-Prakash/Balboa · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Toplitzky
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-10-17 · LA - LATC 4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katrina Lebedeva
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-17 · SGV Valley Cats-Johnson-WN/ SA,SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nancy Carell
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-10-10 · LA - LATC 4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Sarner
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · SGV Registered Set Offenders-Bennett-Freemont /SU1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JB Bauersfeld mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-20 · SGV Valley Cats-Johnson-WN/ SA,SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Sarner
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-19 · LA - LATC 4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stacy Sarner
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-13 · Trial and Error/Heum/El Cariso · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JB Bauersfeld mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · LA - Queen Anne 4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katy Palfrey
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-2
W
2026-06-21 · SGV Valley Cats-Johnson-WN/SA8 · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · Vamos/Johnson-Prakash/Balboa · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alita Haytayan
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · LA - Queen Anne 4.5W · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Danelle Geller
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
8W–0L · 68.3% of games
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.3% of games
4.0
62.8%
54W–32L · 59% of games
4.5
33.3%
7W–14L · 43.9% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 61% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.3% of games
9.0
20%
1W–4L · 44% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams