← Search

Jessica Hoopes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Chester, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 6W–7L · seasons 2019–2022
Match history13 matches
L
2022-06-28 · Radley Run · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dara Main
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2021-08-03 · Radley Run CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Hoffmann
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2021-07-27 · Radley Run CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Toney
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-2
L
2021-07-20 · Radley Run CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Boylston
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2021-07-06 · Radley Run CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Boylston
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2021-06-29 · Radley Run CC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dara Main
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2019-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hannah Christopher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2019-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patti Berk
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2019-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debbie Hoy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
W
2019-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Victoria Novak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 7-6
L
2019-06-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lelia Ferrer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2019-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hannah Christopher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2022–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 53.2% of games
8.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King