← Search

Laura Taylor

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shreveport, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 82W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-03-31 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Louise Sistrunk
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-17 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Chandler
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-24 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Smith
loading the estimate
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-17 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Reed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-02-10 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Chandler
loading the estimate
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-30 · Stratton/40/7.5/WCN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandy Flurry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-16 · Stratton/40/7.5/WCN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Sutton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-09-04 · Stratton/40/7.5/WCN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Sutton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-04-01 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Chandler
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-27 · O’Brien/18/4.0/WD/POTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenifer Doege
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-03-18 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jorie OBrien
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-02-28 · Q-Petersen/18/3.5/WN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Chandler
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 65.5% of games
3.0
81%
17W–4L · 63.4% of games
3.5
65.1%
28W–15L · 59.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.4% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.9% of games
7.5
70.6%
12W–5L · 51.2% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 60.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams