Search

Christina Kim

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
90 matches · 53W–37L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.51
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
45%
stay 3.5
55%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 82% stay · 18% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.43. Lower than today’s 3.51 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
17 of 256
WA · 3.5
78 of 1209

Christina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Christina has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Christina has gone from the 26th to the 85th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 59.5% of games
3.5
51.3%
20W–19L · 51% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 66.8% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
W
Sonia Thomas / Sergio Garciamixed
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Peterson
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
Audrey Tse / Steven Olivermixed
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nad Karim
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Bob Whitaker / Faye Chumixed
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Troy Collard
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Caroline Lee / Rebecca Luong
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paige Ross
+0.117better than expected — took 86% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Melissa Beckman / Trucmai Tran
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Busby
+0.029better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Bing Hattori / Carol High
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Araza
+0.004about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Philip Thomas / Debbie Ababamixed
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wayne Tsujisaka
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Maile Intrachat / Lyndsey Gillis
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Cooper
0.015below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Paulo Dutra / Elena Rishesmixed
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wayne Tsujisaka
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Zhe Li / Jing Li
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Busby
+0.067better than expected — took 71% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Evan Wong / Kristine Rizzomixed
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Kawamoto
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Camille Louie / Jophil Nayvemixed
2026-02-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Derrick Contreras
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.