← Search

Jeme Avent

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
482 matches · 325W–157L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history482 matches
L
2026-10-13 · Ji.Darnell18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Ostrander
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-10-12 · Er.Conigliaro40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carly Kouskolekas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-08 · Ji.Darnell18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Aileen Carroll
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-27 · Cooke/Gardner · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alexis Steele
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-09-21 · Er.Conigliaro40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carly Kouskolekas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · Li.Ihly55C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberley Matthews
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-03 · Ji.Darnell18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hadley Misenheimer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · Er.Conigliaro40C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jill Darnell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-28 · Li.Ihly55C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Ostrander
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
Default
2026-08-20 · Ji.Darnell18C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Allison Ostrander
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-14 · Li.Ihly55C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Ihly
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-13 · Ji.Darnell18C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Violaine Romans-Murray
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams119 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
2.5
90.9%
20W–2L · 79% of games
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 77.8% of games
3.5
72%
36W–14L · 62.6% of games
4.0
65%
119W–64L · 56.5% of games
4.5
59.3%
16W–11L · 52.8% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.1% of games
6.5
85.7%
30W–5L · 67.1% of games
7.5
69%
40W–18L · 56.6% of games
8.5
58%
29W–21L · 53.2% of games
9.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.7% of games
4.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 56.8% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
226 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
123 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
80 matches
#1 Singles
5%
25 matches
#3 Singles
3%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer