← Search

Susan Drylie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Medford, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 9W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history30 matches
W
Default
2026-07-07 · HFC Fun Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Yuhas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · HFC Fun Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Resnick
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Match Makers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila O'Connell
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · HFC Fun Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Barbour
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-02 · HFC Fun Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Pellon
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · Match Makers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Pellon
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-19 · HFC Fun Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne Barbour
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
L
2025-08-19 · HFC Fun Gals · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Bulman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-05 · HFC Fun Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Bulman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-4
W
2025-07-29 · HFC Fun Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Bulman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-07-18 · HFC Fun Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Lynn Jewett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-08 · HFC Fun Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Bulman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 36.8% of games
7.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 70% of the time
#3 Doubles
70%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova