← Search

Cheryl Baumann

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Daniel Island, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
257 matches · 147W–110L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history257 matches
W
2026-10-29 · LCTA18/Staebell/DIC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Amos
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-28 · LCTA39/Baumann/DIC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Moynihan
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-22 · LCTA18/Staebell/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Moynihan
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-15 · LCTA18/Staebell/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lani Staebell
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-10-14 · LCTA39/Baumann/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Putignano
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-08 · LCTA18/Staebell/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannie Fernandez
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-07 · LCTA39/Baumann/DIC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katelyn Howard
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-01 · LCTA18/Staebell/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Putignano
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-30 · LCTA39/Baumann/DIC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeannie Fernandez
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-24 · LCTA18/Staebell/DIC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Moynihan
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-14 · LCTA40/Frey/DIC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lee Propes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-09-09 · LCTA40/Frey/DIC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Little
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50.9%
29W–28L · 47.3% of games
3.5
63.6%
75W–43L · 54.2% of games
4.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.7% of games
5.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.8% of games
6.5
44.4%
16W–20L · 47.7% of games
7.5
65%
13W–7L · 53.8% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 51.4% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
116 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
38 matches
#1 Singles
7%
17 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer