← Search

LUIS SANTANA

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Albuquerque, NM
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 58W–13L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history71 matches
W
2025-10-20 · NNM/Chambliss/Adult 65&Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Mulvihill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-10-14 · NNM/Chambliss/Adult 65&Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Mulvihill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-10-06 · NNM/Chambliss/Adult 65&Over/7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Mulvihill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-10-02 · NNM/Chambliss/Adult 65&Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Tucker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-6
L
2025-09-22 · NNM/Chambliss/Adult 65&Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Mulvihill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-4
L
2025-09-18 · NNM/Chambliss/Adult 65&Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Tucker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-08 · NNM/Chambliss/Adult 65&Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Mulvihill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-09-05 · NNM/Chambliss/Adult 65&Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Herrera
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-08-25 · NNM/Chambliss/Adult 65&Over/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Mulvihill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
W
2023-10-18 · NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Louis Landon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
W
2023-10-16 · NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Martinez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2023-10-04 · NNM 7.0M JC - Chambliss · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Mulvihill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.4% of games
7.0
86.7%
52W–8L · 65.5% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 70% of the time
#1 Doubles
70%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert