← Search

Mary Beth McGee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
MORRISTON, FL
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 32W–17L · seasons 2019–2023
Match history49 matches
L
2023-10-28 · GO - Hollnagel · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Broder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-10-23 · GO - Hollnagel · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Broder
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-02-06 · FK - Doubles Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glen Gandiongco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2023-01-23 · FK - Doubles Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chaya Jollu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2022-12-14 · GO - Hollnagel · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Fay Owings
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2022-12-09 · GO - Hollnagel · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Kovalenko
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
W
2022-12-05 · GO - Tompkins · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sara Dahill
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-12-03 · GO - Hollnagel · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Kovalenko
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2022-11-16 · GO - Hollnagel · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Eiland
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2022-11-14 · GO - Tompkins · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katie Moon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2022-11-13 · GO - Hollnagel · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenny Tompkins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-10-29 · GO - Tompkins · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sara Dahill
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
100%
7W–0L · 62.8% of games
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.1% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 46.8% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.8% of games
6.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 63% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal