← Search

Caroline Green

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, WV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 69W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2020. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-11-01 · YMCA Elliot · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sydney Prince
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-29 · YMCA Green · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anita Tate
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-10-28 · YMCA Green · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Cook
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-25 · YMCA Hinkle-Mabe · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Warner
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-10-21 · YMCA Elliot · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sydney Prince
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-10-18 · YMCA Elliot · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sydney Prince
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Warner championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Warner championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-27 · YMCA Elliot · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sydney Prince
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Warner championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Warner championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Warner championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.9% of games
3.5
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.9% of games
4.0
90.3%
28W–3L · 66.1% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.2% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.5% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.7% of games
8.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.4% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#1 Singles
12%
12 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams