Search

Tyler Fix

PHOENIX, AZ
4.5C year-end 2025
141 matches · 91W–50L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.43
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
82%
stay 4.5
18%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.36. Lower than today’s 4.43 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tyler has been 4.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

4.04.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Tyler has gone from the 87th to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
67.1%
51W–25L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
65.7%
23W–12L · 57% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history141 matches
W
Joe Potter
2026-04-12 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.016better than expected — took 86% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Zach Leininger
2026-04-10 · #2 Singles · 4.5
0.019below expectation — took 54% of games against 62% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Brian Sopwith / Max Alfred Fernbacher
2026-04-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Stickney
0.010about as expected — took 53% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Cody Kacerek
2026-03-30 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.042better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Michael Sainz
2026-03-23 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.019below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
David Gold
2026-03-02 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.006better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Taylor Kim
2026-02-23 · #1 Singles · 4.5
0.034below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Hernan Cabrera
2026-02-16 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.042better than expected — took 86% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Mario Reid
2026-01-26 · #1 Singles · 4.5
+0.079better than expected — took 100% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Omar Rohana
2025-11-17 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.031better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Christopher DeRosa / Saman Rezaie
2025-11-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Tuhy
0.015below expectation — took 44% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Taylor Kim
2025-10-28 · #2 Singles · 4.5
0.035below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.