← Search

Matt Slimming

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Covington, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
267 matches · 174W–93L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history267 matches
L
2026-10-10 · Barach-40/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Roderick Chandler
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-30 · Barach-40/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Donohue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-08 · Arthur-55/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Gillane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · Parvizian/18s/3.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daysi Valencia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Eckholdt-Arthur/40s/3.5/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daysi Valencia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · Arthur-Eckholdt/55s/3.5/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Roy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Rolling/40s/4.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Windy Montecino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Eckholdt-Arthur/40s/3.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Slimming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · Eckholdt-Arthur/40s/3.5/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Slimming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Rolling/40s/4.0/SC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daysi Valencia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · Eckholdt-Arthur/40s/3.5/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Slimming mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-24 · Arthur-Eckholdt/55s/3.5/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allyson Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 58.2% of games
3.5
66.2%
47W–24L · 56.8% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 43.9% of games
5.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 65.9% of games
6.5
63.5%
33W–19L · 57.9% of games
7.5
60%
6W–4L · 53.6% of games
2.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
71.4%
25W–10L · 58.4% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
84.6%
22W–4L · 63.8% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
106 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
66 matches
#1 Singles
15%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
41 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer