← Search

Leo Reece

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 48W–61L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history109 matches
L
2026-10-14 · Br.Ross40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with John Gouveia
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-24 · Br.Ross40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Emanuel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-22 · Br.Ross40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brent Townsend
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · Ev.Fultz18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Pullara championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-09-19 · Ev.Fultz18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Pullara championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-17 · Ev.Fultz18T · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Ross championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-25 · Le.Reece18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Grant Credle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-23 · Le.Reece18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Grant Credle
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-20 · Br.Ross40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paul Brinckerhoff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · Le.Reece18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Scott Zargo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · Br.Ross40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Wasko
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Le.Reece18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nat Rew
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68.8%
22W–10L · 60.3% of games
3.5
15.8%
6W–32L · 36.6% of games
6.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 45.3% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 47.8% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
17 matches
Singles
12%
13 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova