← Search

MATTHEW HEINRICHS

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Glenwood, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 91W–75L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history166 matches
W
2026-10-18 · Uttenreither - Lord of the Strings · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patrick Hughes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-05 · Uttenreither - Lord of the Strings · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Nellius
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-19 · Uttenreither - Lord of the Strings · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ty Garrison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-16 · Uttenreither - Lord of the Strings · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richie Wang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · Uttenreither - Lord of the Strings · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ty Garrison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-4
W
2026-08-03 · Rothstein - Surfing The Net 40+ 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Heinrichs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · Anderson - Future Pickleballers 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hansberry
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · Rothstein - Surfing The Net 40+ 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Anderson - Future Pickleballers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hansberry
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · Anderson - Future Pickleballers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Alsheimer
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-27 · Rothstein - Surfing The Net 40+ 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Heinrichs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-26 · Anderson - Future Pickleballers 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Hansberry
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.9% of games
3.0
66.7%
20W–10L · 57.6% of games
3.5
45.2%
19W–23L · 49.9% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 51.8% of games
6.0mixed
65.7%
23W–12L · 57.2% of games
7.0mixed
35.7%
10W–18L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
24 matches
#1 Singles
6%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert