← Search

Sang Woo Ham

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Berkeley, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 71W–57L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history128 matches
W
2026-10-31 · WASHINGTON PK - BURLINGAME CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Philip McMahon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-10-11 · WASHINGTON PK - BURLINGAME CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Minh La
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-03 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Aleksander Klibisz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CM8.5A · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Aleksander Klibisz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-20 · WASHINGTON PK - BURLINGAME CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tony Xiong
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-13 · WASHINGTON PK - BURLINGAME CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Noah Trac
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-09-06 · WASHINGTON PK - BURLINGAME CM7.5A · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wonjae Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-05 · WASHINGTON PK - BURLINGAME CM7.5A · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Zachary Dranoff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CM8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Frederick Crescencio
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-27 · RICHMOND TA/NICHOLL PK CM8.5A · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dae Kim
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Young Min Kim championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · WASHINGTON PK - BURLINGAME 18AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Young Min Kim
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
7W–0L · 71.7% of games
4.0
57.1%
24W–18L · 54.6% of games
7.5
50%
16W–16L · 50.2% of games
8.5
30%
3W–7L · 43.2% of games
7.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 56.7% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 47.2% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
37 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert