← Search

Michael Kang

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Washington, DC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 6W–8L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history14 matches
L
2026-10-11 · Serving Body & Face · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Timothy Murphy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-6
W
2026-09-27 · Serving Body & Face · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3
L
2025-03-22 · Pair Jordans · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Newburn mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-02 · Pair Jordans · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Claire Weinrib mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-4
W
2024-08-25 · Pair Jordans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trey Perez
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-2
L
2024-08-24 · Pair Jordans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josh Perry
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-08-11 · Pair Jordans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trey Perez
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2024-08-04 · Pair Jordans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trey Perez
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-5
W
2024-07-07 · Pair Jordans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Polmanteer
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2021-05-22 · Capital Crushers · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-4
L
2021-05-01 · Capital Crushers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ishmael Alejo
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-5
L
2021-04-24 · Capital Crushers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christian King
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
50%
5W–5L · 49.2% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova