← Search

Hiromi Saito

Honolulu, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
172 matches · 103W–69L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Hiromi Saito to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history172 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Pair-adise City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cruz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · Pair-adise City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Cruz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-26 · Backhanded Compliments · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · with Karen Yamaguchi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Karen Yamaguchi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Kanae Abe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · Pair-adise City · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with June Yamamura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Deuces Wild · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keiko Morales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · Deuces Wild · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Haruko Froeb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Miss Hits · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · Deuces Wild · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa MacHida
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
77.5%
31W–9L · 65.4% of games
4.0
40%
12W–18L · 47.6% of games
7.0
70%
21W–9L · 62.3% of games
8.0
50%
10W–10L · 50.3% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
26 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
11 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova